High Court rejected Criminal Revision Application No. 43 of 2015 allowed by this court separately. Ordered separately. Disposition: rejected. Quality: thin
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14.REVN.43.15.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 43 OF 2015
Paresh Indravan Mehta
…Applicant
V/s.
CBI, BS & FC, (EOW) Mumbai and Ors.…Respondents
Mr. P.R. Moses for the applicant in REVN/43/2015
Mr. Raja Thakare, Senior Counsel a/w. Mr. Siddharth jagushte I.by Mr
Amol J. Phoujdar for applicant in REVN/251/2015
Ms. Ameeta Kuttikrishnan for the respondent nos. 1 and 2.
Ms. Anamika Malhotra – APP for the State.
CORAM:SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J
DATED:5th MARCH 2020.
P.C. :
.For the reasons to be stated separately, the revision
application is rejected.
(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J)
1 of 1
varsha
Paresh Indravan Mehta
CBI, BS & FC, (EOW) Mumbai
Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court