This PIL sought modification of admission rules for MBA/MCA/BE courses. The petitioner, admitted as a social worker with no student status, was dismissed because the court was not obliged to examine the grievance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
suresh
16-PIL-161.2013.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.161 OF 2013
Suresh Mehtabsingh Jain .... Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Others .... Respondents
.... Respondents
Mr. Vikas B. Tapkir for the Petitioner. Mr. B.V. Samant, AGP, for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & R.I. CHAGLA, JJ. DATE : FEBRUARY 03, 2020
P.C:
(R.I. CHAGLA, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Digitally signed by SURESH JAGDISH Page 1 of 1 SAJNAWAT Date: 2020.02.05 17:09:39 +0530
SURESH JAGDISH SAJNAWAT
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, not being a student, teacher or academician, qualifies to file a PIL regarding admission rules for MBA/MCA/BE courses.
Suresh Mehtabsingh Jain
State of Maharashtra
S.C. Dharmdhikari
R.I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
