Disposed

Wecom Trust and 2 Anr. v. Union of India and 5 Ors. and Anil Parab

Bombay HC8 Jan 2020NMW/355/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of several notices of motion in a PIL regarding activities at Shivaji Park, finding that vigilant civil society and residents could monitor activities instead of approaching the court to act as a watchman. The PIL and chamber summons were listed for a future date.

What did the court decide?

All pending notices of motion were disposed of; PIL and chamber summons listed for future date.

Wecom Trust and 2 Anr. Vs Union of India and 5… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Bombay HC (2020)

¶1

903-PILG-116.2009.doc

¶2

suresh

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.116 OF 2009

¶4

WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.479 OF 2010 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.421 OF 2011 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.116 OF 2009

¶5

Wecom Trust & Others .... Petitioners Vs. The Union of India & Others .... Respondents

¶6

WITH

¶7

NOTICE OF MOTION NO.355 OF 2012 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.116 OF 2009

¶8

Anil Parab .... Applicant In the matter between Wecom Trust & Others .... Petitioners Vs. The Union of India & Others .... Respondents

¶9

WITH

¶10

NOTICE OF MOTION NO.378 OF 2016 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.116 OF 2009

¶11

Wecom Trust & Others .... Applicants In the matter between Wecom Trust & Others .... Petitioners Vs. The Union of India & Others .... Respondents

¶12

WITH

¶13

NOTICE OF MOTION NO.298 OF 2017 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.116 OF 2009

¶14

Page 1 of 3

¶15

suresh 903-PILG-116.2009.doc Wecom Trust .... Applicant In the matter between Wecom Trust & Others .... Petitioners Vs. The Union of India & Others .... Respondents

¶16

WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.168 OF 2016 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.116 OF 2009

¶17

Dipak Kumar Chattopadhyay .... Applicant/ Intervener In the matter between Wecom Trust & Others .... Petitioners Vs. The Union of India & Others .... Respondents

¶18

Mr. Vishesh Kalra for the Petitioners. Mr. Parag Vyas with Mr. H.V. Mehta for Respondent No.1-UoI.

¶19

Ms Geeta Shastri, Addl. GP, for the Respondent-State. Mr. A.Y. Sakhare, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ashwin Sakolkar & Ms K.H. Mastakar for the MCGM. Ms Anchita Nair i/by Ms Sharmila Deshmukh for Respondent No.4. Mr. Vikas Warekar i/by Warekar & Warekar for the Mumbai Cricket Association.

¶20

CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & R.I. CHAGLA, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 08, 2020

¶21

P.C:

¶22

In the light of the orders passed on the previous occasions and the affidavit of compliance, we do not think that the notices of motion should be kept pending.

¶23

Page 2 of 3

¶24

903-PILG-116.2009.doc

¶25

suresh

¶26

The affidavit in reply addresses the concerns of the litigants and particularly the PIL petitioners before us.

¶27

Needless to clarify that in matters of this nature, when the larger challenge is pending, the vigilant members of the Civil Society and the people residing in and around Shivaji Park would be well advised to keep a watch and vigil on the activities at this venue/Shivaji Park. It is not that the Court alone should be approached and converted into a watchman to keep such vigil as is expected by this PIL litigants. All the afore-stated motions are, therefore, disposed of.

¶28

List the PIL and the chamber summons on

¶29

15-1-2020 .

¶30

(R.I. CHAGLA, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)

¶31

Digitally signed by SURESH SURESH JAGDISH JAGDISH SAJNAWAT SAJNAWAT Date:2020.01.13 11:22:59 +0530

¶32

Page 3 of 3

Wecom Trust and 2 Anr. v. Union of India and 5 Ors. and Anil Parab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Wecom Trust and 2 Anr. v. Union of India and 5 Ors. and Anil Parab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shaikh Faiyaz Ahmed @ Fruitwala and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra and 4 Ors.

Nilesh Rajaram Chavan Vs State of Maharashtra through Ministry of Rurual Development Dept. and Anr.

Zubair Md. Aleem Dandu Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Wecom Trust and 2 Anr. Vs Union of India and 5 Ors.

Wecom Trust and 2 Anr. Vs Union of India and 5 Ors.

Wecom Trust and 2 Anr. Vs Union of India and 5 Ors.