Kiran Kamlakar Deshmukh v. Dhanashri Kiran Deshmukh
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court Bench at Aurangabad held Family Court Appeal No. 41 of 2019 and related civil application abated on grounds that appellant's father, who appeared to pursue cause, is deceased with no interested legal heir.
What did the court decide?
Family Court Appeal No. 41 of 2019 and Civil Application No. 5750 of 2019 disposed of as abated.
What the court decided
1 FCA/ 41 /2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 41 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATON NO. 5750 OF 2019 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 41 OF 2019
KIRAN KAMLAKAR DESHMUKH VERSUS
DHANASHRI KIRAN DESHMUKH
Mr. A.D. Khot, Advocate for appellant-applicant Mr. S.R. Choukidar, Advocate for respondent
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH & B.U. DEBADWAR, JJ. DATE : 28-01-2020
ORDER :
- Learned counsel for appellant tenders across
communication dated 14-01-2020 addressed to him by father of appellant, referring to that he is no more and has not left behind legal heir, who would be interested in prosecuting the cause under the appeal. Photocopy of communication is marked “ X ” for identification.
- In view of the same, since the family court appeal would not be carried forward by legal representative or legal heir legitimately, same is disposed of as abated.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
KIRAN KAMLAKAR DESHMUKH
- respondent
DHANASHRI KIRAN DESHMUKH
Coram
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Sudhir Gangadhar Patil Vs Arvind Kashinath Gajeshwar and Others
Subhash Ramchandra Wani and Others Vs Arvind Kashinath Gajeshwar and Others
Kuldeep Shankarrao Rathod Vs Director of Medical Education and Research Govt Dental College and Hospital Mumbai and Another
Baban Govind Rathod Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others