Mr Vijay Sakharam Gaikar v. Haresh K Nanwani and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
A batch of continuation petitions was adjourned to 16/03/2020 due to paucity of time. The court noted the status of any existing ad-interim or interim relief.
What did the court decide?
Adjourned to 16/03/2020. Recorded operation of existing interim relief.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
CONT. PETITION STAMP NO. 8373 OF 2017
Mr Vijay Sakharam Gaikar ....Petitioner V/S Haresh K Nanwani And Ors ....Respondent
WITH
CONT. PETITION STAMP NO. 8374 OF 2017
Mr Akhilesh A Chaubey ....Petitioner V/S
Haresh K Nanwani And Ors ....Respondent
WITH
CONT. PETITION STAMP NO. 8378 OF 2017
Mr Uttam M Chandvale ....Petitioner V/S Haresh K Nanwani And Ors ....Respondent
WITH
CONT. PETITION STAMP NO. 8379 OF 2017
Smt Vimal Manohar Bhartu ....Petitioner V/S Haresh K Nanwani And Ors ....Respondent
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mr Vijay Sakharam Gaikar
- petitioner
Mr Akhilesh A Chaubey
- petitioner
Mr Uttam M Chandvale
- petitioner
Smt Vimal Manohar Bhartu
- petitioner
Smt Jadavati Gulabshankar Pande
- petitioner
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
28 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court