The High Court of Bombay (Appellate Side) adjourned a continuation petition on account of paucity of time, directing that any existing interim relief continues until the next date.
Adjournment to 06/05/2020; continuation of existing interim relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
CONT. PETITION STAMP NO. 8838 OF 2019
Magdum Dagdu Pathan And Ors. ....Petitioner V/S
Avinash Dosatwar,the Regional Dy. ....Respondent Commissioner And Ors.
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI &
R. I. CHAGLA, JJ DATE : 7th February, 2020
P.C. :
Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 06/05/2020 . In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Page 1/1
Magdum Dagdu Pathan And Ors.
Avinash Dosatwar, the Regional Dy. Commissioner And Ors.
S. C. Dharmadikari
R. I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
