A contempt petition arising from delay in disposing a representation was dismissed as the delay was excusable and the order had been complied with.
The Contempt Petition is dismissed as the conduct was not contemptuous and the order was already complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 44 CP 360-18.doc
Sequeira
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 360 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 11023 OF 2014
Shri Madhukar Kisan Phalle Vs
.. Petitioner
The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Mr.Karan Thorat-Addl. Government Pleader, for Respondents.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M.S.KARNIK , JJ. Date : 17 February 2020.
P.C. :
By order dated 21 April 2015 representation made by Respondent-Original Petitioner was directed to be disposed of in time-bound period since it was not done Contempt Petition has been filed.
2 44 CP 360-18.doc
M.S.KARNIK, J. NITIN JAMDAR, J.
Maria LuizaSequeira Digitally signed by MariaLuiza SequeiraDate: 2020.02.2614:21:27 +0530
Shri Madhukar Kisan Phalle
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jandam
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
