The Commissioner of Cgst and Central Excise v. Bank of India
Bombay HCCEXA/54/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Adjournment order calling out appeal for rejection due to failure to remove office objections.
What the court decided
AI extract
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
JSB
¶2
Before: Shyam C. Chandak Prothonotary & Senior Master. Date: 24th January, 2020
¶3
CALLED OUT FOR REJECTION :
¶4
- CEXAL/128/2019 ) None present for the Appellant. IA/1/2019 ) ) P.C.: Appellant and/or his/her Advocate ) to remove office objections on the Appeal ) and to get the same numbered and/or ) registered within 3 weeks after disposal of ) Interim Application for condonation of ) delay, failing Appeal to stand rejected under ) O.S. Rule 986 for non-compliance of office ) objections.
¶5
- MVXAL/10/2019 VAT SECOND APP
¶6
- 886/2018
¶7
- MVXAL/11/2019 RECTIFICATION APPLICATION NO. 31/2016
¶8
- ) Mr. S.B. Gore, AGP for the Appellant. ) ) P.C.: Appellant and/or his/her Advocate ) to remove office objections on the Appeal ) and to get the same numbered and/or ) registered on or before 21.02.2020, failing ) Appeal to stand rejected under O.S. Rule 986 ) for non-compliance of office objections.
¶9
24-01-2020
¶10
Prothonotary and Senior Master
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · B.p. Colabawalla Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla
- Order 2 · B.p. Colabawalla Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court