The High Court disposed of the appeal on a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the appeal due to the arising issue of taxability, without further adjudication on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DDR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 13 OF 2020
The Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Palghar ..Appellant vs. Punmiya Metal Industries ..Respondent
Mr. J.B. Mishra a/w. Mr. Sham Walve for the appellant. Mr. Sriram Sridharan for the respondent.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M.S.KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : 27 FEBRUARY 2020
P.C.:-
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
1/2
Appeal is, therefore, not maintainable in the High Court. The Appeal is accordingly, disposed of.
(M.S.KARNIK, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
Digitally
signed byDiksha
Diksha Rane
Rane Date:2020.02.28
13:11:23
+0530
2/2
Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Palghar
Punmiya Metal Industries
Nitin Jamdar
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
