CMA allowed to permit filing of the Affidavit-in-Reply in the main Writ Petition. The petition was listed for further hearing.
CMA allowed to permit filing of the Affidavit-in-Reply and disposed; Petition listed for further hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10 -i- caw 762-18.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 962 OF 2018 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 10191 OF 2014
The State of Maharashtra & Ors
..Applicant
v/s.
Shri Mathew Anthony Fernandes.
..Respondents
Ms.P.N.Diwan a/w. Mr.A.I.Patel Addl. GP for the State- Respondent .Mr. Pradnyesh Lokegaokar a/w. Tanvi Doshi i/b/ Little & Co. for the Applicant.
Mr. Amol Gatne i/b.D.S.Patil for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.A.SAYED &
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. DATED : 5TH FEBRUARY, 2020.
P.C. :
Civil Application in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
the Petition on 18.02.2020.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (A.A.SAYED, J.)
1 of 1
salgaonkar
The State of Maharashtra & Ors
Shri Mathew Anthony Fernandes
A.A. Sayed
Anjuj Prabhu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
