Disposed

Dr. Umakant S/O Padmakar Ramteke v. State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Public Health Department, Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC16 Jan 2020CAW/3408/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Coram allowed Civil Application (W) No. 3408/2019 to amend a previous writ petition within one week and disposed of the application. Notice was issued to an added respondent and waived by the respondent.

What did the court decide?

Allowed amendment to be carried out within one week; disposed of the application.

What the court decided

Dr. Umakant S/O Padmakar Ramteke Vs… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2020)

¶1

WP3322.19

¶2

1/1

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION (W) NO. 3408/2019 IN WRIT PETITION No.3322/2019

¶5

Dr.Umakant P.Ramteke

¶6

Vs.

¶7

The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Public Health Deptt, Mantralaya, Mumbai and
others.

¶8

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders
or directions and Registrar’s orders.

¶9

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

¶10

Shri G.A.Kunte, Advocate for applicant/petitioner.

¶11

Mrs. S.S.Jachak, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent
nos. 1, 2 and 4.

¶12

CORAM: R.K.DESHPANDE and
 A.S.CHANDURKAR, JJ.

¶13

DATE: 16.01.2020

¶14

For the reasons stated in Civil Application
No.3408/2019, the application is allowed. Necessary
amendment be carried out within a one week. The
application stands disposed of.

¶15

Writ Petition No.3322/2019

¶16

Issue notice to the newly added respondent,
returnable on 23.01.2020.

¶17

Mrs. S.S.Jachak, learned Assistant

¶18

Government Pleader waives notice of service for added
respondent.

¶19

 JUDGE JUDGE

¶20

Andurkar..

Dr. Umakant S/O Padmakar Ramteke v. State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Public Health Department, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Dr. Umakant S/O Padmakar Ramteke v. State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Public Health Department, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohan S/O Jijeba Gore Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, General Administration Department, Mumbai

Saquib Nadeem S/O Abdul Naim Vs Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad and Others

Mr. Sanjay S/O Tikadas Ninawe Vs Suresh Wankhede, Joint Commissioner and Vice Chairman, S. T. Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee

Vidharbha Processing and Marketing Cooperative Society, through Manager, Shri Babarao Daryaji Lothe Vs the Collector, Washim

Mahila Arthik Vikas Bachat Gut, through Its President, Smt. Karuna W/O Krishnarao Chimankar Vs the State of Maharashtra,through Its Secretary, Women and Child Development Department, Mumbai and

Hbt Security Force, Nagpur through Prop. Mohammad Ruhul Amin Qureshi Vs State of Maharashtra, Minorities Development Department, Mumbai through Secretary and Others