Dismissed

M/S. Dewoo Shine Restaurant through Prop. Shri. Gajanan Sakharam Tidke v. the State of Maharashtra, State Excise, Maharashtra State, Mumbai Thr. Secretary and Others

Bombay HC17 Jan 2020CAW/101/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of two civil applications filed for correction in the register of Civil Writ Petitions. Minor clerical corrections regarding the description of the relief sought and the specified period were ordered to be made in the official order. No legal principles were laid down.

What did the court decide?

Correction of clerical errors regarding the description of the license and the time period in the challenged orders.

M/S. Dewoo Shine Restaurant through Prop. Shri… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2020)

¶1

906.CA100.20.odt

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.100/2020 IN

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.4966/2019

¶6

M/s. Aditya Restaurant Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others.

¶7

WITH

¶8

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.101/2020 IN

¶9

WRIT PETITION NO.4968/2019

¶10

M/s. Dewoo Shine Restaurant Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others.

¶11

…........................................................................................................................................
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order
of directions and Registrar's orders

¶12

........................................................................................................................................…...
Shri S. G. Jagtap, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶13

Ms. A. R. Kulkarni, Assistant Government Pleader for respondents.

¶14

CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE &

¶15

A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ. DATED : 17^th JANUARY, 2020.

¶16

.Civil Application Nos.100 of 2020 and 101 of
2020 filed for speaking to minutes are not opposed. The
words “seeking permission to shift the FL-III License”
appearing in the order dated 06.01.2020 at two places be
substituted by the words “issuance of FL-III License”.

¶17

2.Similarly, in place of “period of six months”
prescribed in para 3, it should be substituted by “period of
six weeks”.

¶18

3.Necessary correction be carried out in the
order.

¶19

4. Both Civil Applications stand disposed of.

¶20

JUDGEJUDGE

¶21

RGurnule

M/S. Dewoo Shine Restaurant through Prop. Shri. Gajanan Sakharam Tidke v. the State of Maharashtra, State Excise, Maharashtra State, Mumbai Thr. Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Dewoo Shine Restaurant through Prop. Shri. Gajanan Sakharam Tidke v. the State of Maharashtra, State Excise, Maharashtra State, Mumbai Thr. Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hbt Security Force, Nagpur through Prop. Mohammad Ruhul Amin Qureshi Vs State of Maharashtra, Minorities Development Department, Mumbai through Secretary and Others

Mahila Arthik Vikas Bachat Gut, through Its President, Smt. Karuna W/O Krishnarao Chimankar Vs the State of Maharashtra,through Its Secretary, Women and Child Development Department, Mumbai and

Vidharbha Processing and Marketing Cooperative Society, through Manager, Shri Babarao Daryaji Lothe Vs the Collector, Washim

Satish Eknath Majoke Vs the Chief Conservator of Forests , Van Vrutta and Another

Jaiswal Infrastructure, Nagpur through Its Proprietor, Rajendra Jaiswal Vs Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise and Gst, Nagpur and Another

Sau. Sandhya Vijay Gadbail Vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary of Rural Development Department, Mumbai and Others