Shraddha Prabhakar Patil and Ors. Vs Bharat Ragunath Patil and Anr.

1 None appears for the respondent No. 1 although served. Office note shows that the respondent No.1 is represented by advocate Mr. Sandeep Naik. However, he is not present today. Office note shows that notice is issued to respondent No. 2 and the same is awaited. None appears for the respondent No. 1 on 17/1/2020. In view of this, application deserves to be heard.

¶17

2 This is an application seeking condonation of delay in filing Second Appeal. The delay is of 1 year 248 days in filing second appeal. For the reasons assigned in paragraphs-7 and 8,

¶18

Talwalkar

¶19

8.cas496.19.doc

¶20

2

¶21

delay of 1 year and 248 days, deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice upon depositing cost of Rs. 500/- within 3 weeks from today with Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority. The application is allowed on the above terms and disposed of accordingly.

¶22

[SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.]

¶23

Talwalkar

Shraddha Prabhakar Patil and Ors. v. Bharat Ragunath Patil and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shraddha Prabhakar Patil and Ors. v. Bharat Ragunath Patil and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramnath Haribhau Gavali Vs Rajesh Chhotiram Ghuge and Anr.

Shir.Savalaram Gajanan Patil Vs Shri. Shama Gajanan Patil and Other

Shama Gajanan Patil and Ors. Vs Shir.Savalaram Gajanan Patil

Jyoti Sagar Samel Vs Sagar Prabhakar Samel

Mr.Nandkumar Manohar Sabale Vs Mr.Dattatray Bhiku Sabale and Others

Shri.Ramrao Shamrao Kamble Vs Shri.Vinayak Narayan Mali and Ors.