Procedural order without substantive legal reasoning where the High Court listed arbitration matters for hearing with a prohibition on further adjournments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903-CARBP-347-2020.DOC
Ashwini
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION
COMM ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 347 OF 2020
Capt Derrick Vaz & Anr ...Petitioners Versus Vikram Singh Ram Singh Alias & Vikram Ram ...Respondent Singh
WITH
COMM ARBITRATION APPLICATION (L) NO. 69 OF 2020
Capt Derrick Vaz & Anr ...Petitioners Versus Vikram Singh Ram Singh Alias & Vikram Ram ...Respondent Singh
Mr SU Kamdar , Senior Advocate , with Mr Aditya, i/b Merlyn Monteiro, for the Petitioner.
Dr Abhinav Chandrachud , i/b Altaf Khan, for the Respondent No.1. Ms Priyanka Daga , with Ms Monica Salian, i/b Jayakar & Partners, for the Respondent No. 2.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J. DATED: 4th March 2020
PC:-
Page 1 of 2 4th March 2020
903-CARBP-347-2020.DOC
1. By consent, list the matters on 12th March 2020 at the end of the supplementary board. There will be no further adjournments.
2. Previous orders to continue.
(G. S. PATEL, J)
Page 2 of 2 4th March 2020
Capt Derrick Vaz & Anr
Vikram Singh Ram Singh Alias & Vikram Ram ...Respondent Singh
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
