Disposed

Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation through Its Executive Engineer v. Rajendra Narayan Mahalle and 2 Others

Bombay HC13 Jan 2020CAF/4494/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order in a civil application granted the correction of the original respondent's name in court records to include both 'Rajendra Narayan Mahalle' and 'Rajendra Narayan Deshmukh' to resolve a discrepancy. The court permitted withdrawal of deposited amounts only after verification of documentary evidence supporting the name change and imposed a penalty for lack of attached evidence.

What did the court decide?

Order to correct the name in records to 'Rajendra Narayan Mahalle also known as Rajendra Narayan Deshmukh' and permit withdrawal of deposited amount upon verification.

Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2020)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶3

CAF No.4494/2019 in First Appeal No.217 OF 2016

¶4

The Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation

¶5

vs.

¶6

Rajendra Narayan Mahalee

¶7

.............................................................................................................................................. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders

¶8

.............................................................................................................................................. Shri V. V. Dahat, Advocate holding for Shri J.B. Kasat, Advocate for the Appellant. Shri S.B.Bissa, AGP for Respondent nos.2 and 3. Shri A.B.Nakshane, Advocate holding for Ms. Nisha Burange, Advocate for the Applicant.

¶9

CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATED : 13/01/2020.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the respective parties.

¶11

After disposal of the Appeal on 14.7.2018, the applicant (Original Respondent No.1) has preferred this application wherein he submits that in some of his documents, his name has been shown as, “Rajendra Narayan Deshmukh”. At the time of disposal of the First Appeal, the name of the Original Respondent was shown as “Rajesh Narayan Mahalle”. It appears that an amount of Rs.1,83,505/- has been deposited in this Hon’ble Court, pursuant to the order of disposal and the Applicant (Original Respondent) has made an attempt to withdraw this amount and objection has been raised by

¶12

¶13

the office on the basis of documents, which have been submitted by the Applicant to identify himself. Hence the present application has been preferred. No material has been annexed to the present application to show that the Applicant is also known by the name of “Rajendra Narayan Deshmukh”.

¶14

The present Civil Application can be disposed of by the following order:-

¶15

(i) For the reasons mentioned in the application, the name of the original Respondent be corrected and shown as “Rajendra Narayan Mahalle also known as Rajendra Narayan Deshmukh”. Both the above names shall be shown together.

¶16

(ii) The office shall duly verify the entire documentary evidence, which shall be presented by the applicant/original Respondent and only after due verification of the same, he shall be permitted to withdraw any amount, which has been deposited in this Court as per the earlier orders if there is no other ambiguity.

¶17

(iii) Necessary correction shall be carried out within a period of one week by the Applicant – Original Respondent.

¶18

¶19

The learned counsel appearing for the Appellant (VIDC) has no objection to the same.

¶20

Since the Applicant/Original Respondent no.1 has failed to annex any copies of the documents evidencing the changed/different name, the Applicant is directed to pay cost of Rs.2000/- to the High Court Legal Services, Sub Committee, Nagpur, within a period of two weeks from today and necessary receipt of the same shall be produced before the office at the time of verification of the documents. In the event cost is not deposited or documents are not furnished for verification the Applicant shall not be permitted to withdraw any amount.

¶21

6. Civil Application is disposed of.

¶22

JUDGE

¶23

Ambulkar

Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation through Its Executive Engineer v. Rajendra Narayan Mahalle and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation through Its Executive Engineer v. Rajendra Narayan Mahalle and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yogesh S/O Narayanrao Deshpande Vs the Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati and Others

Rashtriya Mul Niwasi Bahujan Karmachari Sangh, Chandrapur Thr. Its Secretary Vs Hotel Tri-Star Inn Pvt. Ltd., Chandrapur Thr. Its General Manager

Adivasi Seva Sangh vs Lodha Impression Real Estate Pvt. Ltd., and Ors.

Executive Engineer, Lower Wardha Project Division, Wardha Vs Vikas Vigyanchand Jain and 2 Others

The Executive Engineer, Bembla Project Office, Yavatmal Vs Vijay Motiramji Dhabale and Others

Kumud Wd/O Sanjay Gotmare and 3 Others Vs Mohd. Asif Mohd. Rafique and Another