Maharashtra State Powerloom Corporation Limited v. the Bombay Dyeing and Menufacturing Company Limited and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
kvm
1/2
903-CAF3813.19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3813 OF 2019 IN
R.C. NO. 188 OF 2018 (FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 28757 OF 2017)
Maharashtra State Powerloom Corporation Ltd.
….. Appellants
VERSUS
The Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Company Ltd. & Anr.
….. Respondents
Mr.Mahendra C. Moholkar for the Applicants.
None for the Respondents.
CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J. DATE : 29th JANUARY, 2020
P.C .
Learned counsel for the applicant states that the office objections could not be removed within the time prescribed due to the circumstances set out in paragraphs 4 to 8. Delay of 12 days in filing the civil application is also explained in those paragraphs. Learned counsel undertakes to remove all office objections within four weeks from today. Undertaking is accepted. In view of the undertaking rendered by the leaned counsel for the applicant, order dated 9th January,2018 passed by the I/C. Registrar (Judicial-II) is set aside on the condition that the applicant removes all office objections within four weeks from today. It is made clear that no further extension of time would be granted. If the objections are not removed within the time prescribed, the order passed by this court today to stand vacated and the order passed by the I/C. Registrar (Judicial-II) dated 9th
kvm 2/2 903-CAF3813.19 January,2018 to stand restored.
[R.D.DHANUKA, J.]
Maharashtra State Powerloom Corporation Ltd.
The Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Company Ltd.
R.D. DHANUKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court