Allowed

The State of Maharashtra and Anr. v. Tukaram Sakharam Rathod

Bombay HC12 Dec 2020CA/7803/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a National Lok Adalat, the Bombay High Court directed the Registry to condone delay in condonation applications, modify awards passed by reference courts to include interest under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 based on the Tukaram Meshram decision, and ensure compensation disbursement within one year.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of delay allowed; awards modified to include interest under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894; compensation to be disbursed.

The State of Maharashtra and Anr. Vs Tukaram Sakharam Rathod — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2020)

¶1

( 1 )

¶2

15-21 CA 5795-15.odt

¶3

IN THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT PRESIDED OVER BY HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI,

¶4

HELD ON 12^th DECEMBER, 2020 AT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES SUB-COMMITTEE, AT AURANGABAD

¶5

15 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5795 OF 2015

¶6

¶7

F.A.ST.No.9697/2015

¶8

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...Applicants V E R S U S

¶9

BASWARAJ SHIVLING BIRADAR AND ANR.

¶10

...Respondents

¶11

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5796 OF 2015 IN F.A.ST.No.9697 OF 2015

¶12

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...Applicants V E R S U S

¶13

BASWARAJ SHIVLING BIRADAR AND ANR.

¶14

...Respondents

¶15

AND

¶16

16 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9173 OF 2016 IN F.A.ST.No. 14284/2016

¶17

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...Applicants V E R S U S ANANDA VITHOBA BALDE AND ANR ...Respondents

¶18

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9178 OF 2016 IN F.A.ST.No. 14310/2016

¶19

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...Applicants V E R S U S TUKARAM ABHANGRAO BHANDE AND ANR ...Respondents

¶20

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9175 OF 2016 IN F.A.ST.No. 14314/2016

¶21

1/10

¶22

( 2 ) 15-21 CA 5795-15.odt

¶23

...Applicants

¶24

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...Applicants V E R S U S DAGDU HAIBATI BHOSLE ...Respondent

¶25

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9177 OF 2016 IN F.A.ST.No. 14310/2016

¶26

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS V E R S U S

¶27

TUKARAM ABHANGRAO BHANDE AND ANR

¶28

...Applicants

¶29

...Respondents

¶30

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9176 OF 2016 IN

¶31

F.A.ST.No. 14314/2016

¶32

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...Applicants V E R S U S DAGDU HAIBATI BHOSLE ...Respondent

¶33

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9174 OF 2016 IN F.A.ST.No. 14284/2016

¶34

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS V E R S U S

¶35

ANANDA VITHOBA BALDE AND ANR

¶36

...Applicants ...Respondents

¶37

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..Applicants V E R S U S TUKARAM SHESHERAO KENDRE ...Respondent

¶38

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5749 OF 2015 IN F.A.ST.No. 9692/2015

¶39

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..Applicants V E R S U S TUKARAM SHESHERAO KENDRE ...Respondent

¶40

2/10

¶41

( 3 ) 15-21 CA 5795-15.odt

¶42

AND

¶43

18 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8841 OF 2016

¶44

¶45

F.A.ST.No. 13906/2016

¶46

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS V E R S U S

¶47

VIJAYKUMAR TULSHIRAM KARLE

¶48

..Applicants ...Respondent

¶49

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8842 OF 2016 IN F.A.ST.No. 13906/2016

¶50

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS V E R S U S

¶51

VIJAYKUMAR TULSHIRAM KARLE

¶52

..Applicants ...Respondent

¶53

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8843 OF 2016 IN

¶54

F.A.ST.No. 13909/2016

¶55

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS V E R S U S

¶56

MADHAV MASNA KARLE

¶57

..Applicants ...Respondent

¶58

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8844 OF 2016 IN

¶59

F.A.ST.No. 13909/2016

¶60

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...Applicants V E R S U S MADHAV MASNA KARLE ...Respondent

¶61

AND 19 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7797 OF 2016 IN

¶62

F.A.ST.No. 15104/2016

¶63

..Applicants

¶64

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..Applicants V E R S U S ANNARAO MASNAJI BIRADAR ...Respondent

¶65

WITH

¶66

3/10

¶67

( 4 ) 15-21 CA 5795-15.odt

¶68

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7802 OF 2016 IN

¶69

F.A.ST.No. 15161/2016

¶70

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..Applicants V E R S U S NILKANTH MASNAJI BIRADAR ...Respondent

¶71

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7799 OF 2016 IN

¶72

F.A.ST.No. 15158/2016

¶73

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...Applicants V E R S U S BABURAO MASNAJI BIRADAR ...Respondent

¶74

WITH APPLICATION NO.7801 OF 2016 IN

¶75

F.A.ST.No. 15161/2016

¶76

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...Applicants V E R S U S NILKANTH MASNAJI BIRADAR ...Respondent

¶77

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7812 OF 2016 IN

¶78

F.A.ST.No. 15154/2016

¶79

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...Applicants V E R S U S KALYANRAO MASNAJI BIRADAR ...Respondent

¶80

...Respondent

¶81

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7803 OF 2016 IN

¶82

F.A.ST.No. 15164/2016

¶83

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...Applicants V E R S U S TUKARAM SAKHARAM RATHOD ...Respondent

¶84

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7809 OF 2016 IN

¶85

F.A.ST.No. 15167/2016

4/10

15-21 CA 5795-15.odt

( 5 )

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...Applicants V E R S U S KHIRUBAI FAKRU RATHOD ...Respondent

¶90

...Respondent

¶91

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7817 OF 2016 IN

¶92

F.A.ST.No. 15154/2016

¶93

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...Applicants V E R S U S KALYANRAO MASNAJI BIRADAR ...Respondent

¶94

WITH

¶95

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7806 OF 2016 IN

¶96

F.A.ST.No. 15164/2016

¶97

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS V E R S U S

¶98

TUKARAM SAKAHARAM RATHOD

¶99

...Applicants ...Respondent

¶100

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7808 OF 2016 IN F.A.ST.No. 15167/2016

¶101

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS V E R S U S

¶102

KHIRUBAI FAKRU RATHOD

¶103

...Applicants ...Respondent

¶104

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7798 OF 2016 IN

¶105

F.A.ST.No. 15104/2016

¶106

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...Applicants V E R S U S ANNARAO MASNAJI BIRADAR ...Respondent

¶107

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7800 OF 2016 IN F.A.ST.No. 15158/2016

¶108

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...Applicants V E R S U S

¶109

5/10

¶110

( 6 ) 15-21 CA 5795-15.odt

¶111

BABURAO MASNAJI BIRADAR ...Respondent

¶112

AND 20 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8855 OF 2016 IN

¶113

F.A.ST.No. 14287/2016

¶114

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS V E R S U S

¶115

MANIK MADHAVRAO METAGE

¶116

...Applicants ...Respondent

¶117

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8857 OF 2016 IN

¶118

F.A.ST.No. 14301/2016

¶119

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...Applicants V E R S U S ABDUL RASHID KAMRANDDIN ...Respondent

¶120

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8861 OF 2016 IN

¶121

F.A.ST.No. 14305/2016

¶122

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...Applicants V E R S U S PANDHARINATH RAMRAO MANE AND ANR ...Respondents

¶123

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8859 OF 2016 IN

¶124

F.A.ST.No. 14296/2016

¶125

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS V E R S U S

¶126

MADHAV RAMRAO MANE

¶127

...Applicants ...Respondent

¶128

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8856 OF 2016 IN F.A.ST.No. 14287/2016

¶129

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...Applicants V E R S U S MANIK MADHAVRAO METAGE ...Respondent

¶130

WITH

¶131

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8858 OF 2016

¶132

6/10

¶133

¶134

F.A.ST.No. 14301/2016

¶135

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...Applicants V E R S U S ABDUL RASHID KAMRANDDIN ...Respondent

¶136

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8860 OF 2016 IN

¶137

F.A.ST.No. 14296/2016

¶138

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...Applicants V E R S U S MADHAV RAMRAO MANE ...Respondent

¶139

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8862 OF 2016 IN F.A.ST.No. 14305/2016

¶140

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...Applicants V E R S U S

¶141

PANDHARINATH RAMRAO MANE AND ANR

¶142

...Respondents

¶143

21 FIRST APPEAL NO.3433 OF 2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16614/2015

¶144

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...Appellants V E R S U S NILKANTH GNYANOBA PATIL ...Respondent

¶145

Mr. A.M.Phule, A.G.P. for the appellants/State Mr. G.K.Sontakke, learned advocate for the respondent/s

¶146

O R D E R

¶147

These matters are placed before us in today’s National Lok Adalat. These applications for condonation of delay are preferred by the appellants/State.

¶148

7/10

¶149

( 8 ) 15-21 CA 5795-15.odt

¶150

Mr.Sontakke, learned Advocate for the

¶151

respondent/s/original claimant/s is present before the Panel and submits that he has no objection to condone the delay in respective matters.

¶152

In view of the above submissions of the learned AGP and learned Advocate for the respondent/s/original claimant/s, the delay stands condoned and respective applications stand allowed. The Registry is directed to register appeal as per the rules forthwith.

¶153

So far as the appeal proceedings are concerned, it is submitted by Mr.Phule, learned AGP for the appellants/State that the dispute between the parties is regarding award of interest to the claimants under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. He also submits that as per the decision rendered by the Bombay High Court, Bench at Nagpur reported in The State of Maharashtra V/s. Tukaram Meshram and Another [2018(1) All M.R. 645] , the respondent/s is/are entitled to get interest under Section 28 of the L.A.Act, 1894 from the date of award passed by the SLAO and accordingly, the award needs to be modified. Mr.Sontakke, learned Advocate for the respondent/s /original claimant/s submits that he has no objection to modify the award as per decision in the Tukaram Meshram

¶154

8/10

¶155

( 9 ) 15-21 CA 5795-15.odt

¶156

(supra).

¶157

In view of submissions of the learned counsel for both the sides and proposition of law in Tukaram Meshram (supra), the Registry is directed to modify the award passed by the reference Court to the extent of award of interest under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

¶158

The appellants shall submit chart in terms of compromise within 45 days. The original claimants shall make endorsement about its correctness.

¶159

The Registry is also directed to make calculations and after making calculations of awarding of interest under Section 28 of the L.A. Act, 1894 and after modification of award, the amount of compensation be disbursed to the respective respondent/s/original claimant/s.

¶160

Appellants/Acquiring Body shall deposit the amounts as per the modified award within one year from today and thereafter, the Registry to make the payment along with the interest awarded under Section 28 of the L.A. Act, 1894 to the respective respondent/s/original claimant/s accordingly.

¶161

9/10

¶162

( 10 ) 15-21 CA 5795-15.odt

¶163

The First Appeals are disposed of in terms of compromise.

¶164

Pending the civil application/s, if any, is/are disposed of.

¶165

The court fee refund certificate be issued to the appellants/State as per the rules.

¶166

Parties to bear their own costs.

¶167

(S.P. BRAMHE) (S.G. SHETE) (SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI) ADVOCATE DIST.JUDGE(Retd.) JUDGE Member Member HEAD OF THE PANEL

¶168

Date : 12^th December, 2020 Place: Aurangabad

¶169

sarowar

¶170

10/10

The State of Maharashtra and Anr. v. Tukaram Sakharam Rathod

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The State of Maharashtra and Anr. v. Tukaram Sakharam Rathod

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Laxman Manikrao Kharat vs Executive Engineer, Nimna Dhudhana Project Selu and Ors.

The Executive Engineer, Irrigation Project Majbutikarn Division, Omerga and Others Vs Shivaji Maruti Jadhav

Executive Engineer, Nandur Madhmeshwar Canal Division Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

State of Mah Vs Vinayak Shivappa Birajdr

State of Mah Vs Ramesh Rangnath Kulkarni

Bajirao Manikrao Shinde Vs Girish Vasantrao Badge and Anr.