A single judge allowed the applicant's civil application seeking condonation of delay and restoration of a writ petition dismissed in default, partly relying on a parallel proceeding.
The application was allowed in terms of prayer clauses (B) and (C) for condonation of delay and restoration of the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15254.19ca
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.15254 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2846 OF 2009
Abasaheb s/o Baburao Jadhav, Age: 48 years, Occu: Service as Assistant Teacher, R/o. Bhagirati Stree Shikshan Vidyamandir, Wadwali Waghadi, Taluka Paithan, Dist. Aurangabad
..APPLICANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Department of Education, Mantralaya, Mumbai & ors.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr B. L. Sagar Killarikar, Advocate for applicant; Mr S. B. Yawalkar, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 & 2
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ. DATE : 3rd January, 2020
ORAL ORDER:
Heard Mr Killarikar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant.
15254.19ca
(2)
The civil application is disposed of accordingly.
(PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
(ANIL S. KILOR, J.)
sjk
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 566 days in filing the application for condonation of delay in restoring the writ petition is condonable.
Abasaheb s/o Baburao Jadhav
State of Maharashtra
PRASANNA B. VARALE
ANIL S. KILOR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
