A single judge allowed an application for condonation of delay in filing a review application under a writ petition, condoning the delay and disposing of the civil application. It was an oral order without substantive legal principles.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
(906) CA13629-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13629 OF 2019
IN REVIEW APPLICATION ST.NO.35234 OF 2019
IN WRIT PETITION NO.6959 OF 2019
The State of Maharashtra and anr.
.. Applicant
Versus
Shobha Narayanrao Dhankikar
..Respondent
Mr V.M. Kagne, A.G.P. for applicant Mr S.G. Chapalgaonkar, Advocate for original petitioner in W.P.
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE : 24.1.2020
ORAL ORDER :
( SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
vvr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay in filing the review application should be condoned.
State of Maharashtra and anr.
Shobha Narayanrao Dhankikar
Shrikant D. Kulkarni
S.V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
