Seema Raju Sathe v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant moved for bail after long incarceration. The High Court of Judicature at Bombay expressed disinclination to entertain the bail application, leading to its withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh application if charges are not framed within six months.
What did the court decide?
Bail application withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh application in case charges are not framed within six months.
What the court decided
1/2 14 BA-378.20.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.378 OF 2020
Seema Raju Sathe .. Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
… Mr. Sangramsingh Bhonsle, Mr. Siddarth Mehta, Ms. Samridhi Jain, Mr. Abhishek Salian, Mr. Shubham Mhatre i/b Vidhi Partners for the Applicant.
Mr. P.H. Gaikwad, A.P.P. for the State.
CORAM: SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.
DATED : 01ST DECEMBER, 2020.
P.C:-
- I have heard learned counsel for the Applicant. His submission is that the Applicant is a lady and she is incarcerated since 29/06/2019.
- When I have expressed my disinclination to entertain the Application, the Applicant points out that the long incarceration and the possibility that the trial may not commence soon and the fact that the incident took place in the month of June, 2019, he
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Seema Raju Sathe
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Bharati Dangre
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court