and issued the stability certificate came to be released on anticipatory bail by this Court on 18/08/2020 by recording that the repair of the wall on the north-east corner was carried out. It is alleged that the Applicant was an employee of Alcon Landmark and he had received salary from them. His signatures are found on the bills submitted for the work of retaining wall. The Applicant does not dispute the said position but, even going by the charge-sheet, he was working in the capacity of supervising the construction of wall only for a limited period between March, 2013 to July, 2013 when he discharged his duties as site supervisor. The wall collapsed later i.e. on 29/06/2019 and as can be seen from the report of the College of Engineering, Pune as well as the Special Inquiry Report, several other factors have contributed to the collapse of the wall which resulted into the unfortunate incident. The material contained in the charge-sheet reflects that M/s. Alcon Landmark was made aware in the meeting of the Society on 16/02/2019 that the compound wall was shifting outside and the wall quality is not satisfactory. Option was given to replace the same with concrete wall. It is alleged that the accused who were responsible for development of Alcon Stylus Society turned deaf ears to the said report. Pertinent to note that as on 16/02/2019, the present Applicant was not concerned with the partnership firm, which undertook the development. The College of Engineering, Pune which conducted the structural audit of the wall also reports that the wall was found unsafe and the quality of the construction was poor. The technical report covers the technical analysis of the wall. It was noted that several technical parameters regarding strength of the wall are ignored and there found to be much below the required safety
