Dismissed
Sandeep Yashwant Pawaskar v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCBA/132/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
503.BA.132.2020.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.132 OF 2020
Sandeep Yashwant PawaskarApplicant
versus
The State of MaharashtraRespondent
Mr.Ashok B. Tajane for applicant.
Ms.Pallavi N. Dabolkar, APP, for State.
CORAM :PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
DATE : 31st January 2020
PC :
1. Not on board. Production of papers is allowed at 3.00 p.m..
2.Learned advocate for applicant submits that the applicant has
forwarded letter dated 29th January 2020 to him by stating that the
applicant is in custody for a period of 90 days and he intends to
prefer application for bail before Sessions Court. Hence, leave may
be granted to withdraw this application. In view of this statement,
Criminal Bail Application No.132 of 2020 is allowed to be withdrawn
and dismissed as such. It is made clear that this application was not
heard on merits.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
MST
Sandeep Yashwant Pawaskar
The State of Maharashtra
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court