A criminal application was rejected for want of prosecution as the applicants failed to appear or be represented on the hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)APPLNNo.2351991.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.235 OF 1991
Shri Vilas Sitaram Kulkarni & Anr....Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
None for the Applicants.
Mr.S.V.Gavand, the Additional Public Prosecutor for the
Respondent/State.
CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.
DATED : 7th JANUARY 2020.
P.C.:
1None for the applicants. On 26th November 2019 also
nobody appeared for the applicants.
2Hence the application is rejected for want of
prosecution.
(A.M.BADAR, J.)
1/1
Gaikwad RD
Vilas Sitaram Kulkarni & Anr
State of Maharashtra
A.M. Badar J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court