Shrikant Devji Dingankar v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
1083-19-APPA-23=.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1083-19-APPA-23=.doc
Uday S. Jagtap
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1083 OF 2019
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 928 OF 2019
Shrikant Devji Dingankar .. Applicant
v/s.
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
None for the applicant
Mr. P.H. Gaikwad-Patil, APP for respondent State
CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.
DATED : 26th FEBRUARY, 2020
P.C.
1. It reveals from the remark that the order passed by this Court
on 17th September, 2019 directing the appellant to supply spare copy
has not been complied with and, therefore, notice to respondent no.2
could not be issued.
2. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the application for suspension of substantive sentence.
3. The application stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.)
1 of 1
Shrikant Devji Dingankar
The State of Maharashtra
Prithviraj K. Chavan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court