The appellant, who did not wish to press the criminal appeal in light of a Summary Report, had the appeal disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3 APEAL 63 - 2018.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 63 OF 2018
Leelawati Baban Kalbhor & Ors. ] ...Appellants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ] ...Respondent
Mr. Pratap Patil, for the Appellants. Mr. P. H. Gaikwad Patil, APP for State.
CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.
DATE : 05TH FEBRUARY, 2020. P.C:
. Learned Counsel for the appellants, on instructions, submits that the appellant does not wish to press the criminal appeal in view of the Summary Report tendered by the Assistant Police Commissioner, Yerwada, Pune to the Public Prosecutor of this Court.
[PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.]
1 of 1
Manjusha
Leelawati Baban Kalbhor & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra
PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
