Ahmed Shahabuddin Shaikh and Anr. v. Tej Saran and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Order appointing Amicus Curiae in multiple criminal appeals and awarding fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
amicus order.doc
1 / 5
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.389 OF 1997
| THE STATE OF MAH | ARASHTRA ….Appellant |
|---|---|
| V/S | |
| REKHA RAMAKANT | RAHALKAR ….Respondent |
WITHCRIMINAL APPEAL NO.705 OF 2000 |
|
| THE STATE OF MAH | ARASHTRA ….Appellant |
| V/S | |
| GOPAL AMBADAS G | AWALI ….Respondent |
WITH |
|
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.228 OF 2001 |
|
| CENTRAL BUREAU V/S |
OF INVESTIGATION ....Appellant |
| CHANDRAPPA NAG | APPA KEMBHAVI & ORS . ….RespondentsWITH |
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 410 OF 2001 |
|
| UNION OF INDIA V/S |
….Appellant |
| HUKMICHAND JAIN | & ORS ….Respondents |
WITH |
|
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 621 OF 2001 |
|
| UNION OF INDIA V/S |
….Appellants |
| KISAN RATAN SINGH | & ORS ….Respondent |
WITH |
|
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.298 OF 2002 |
|
| UNION OF INDIA V/S |
….Appellant |
| NARENDRA RATANC | HAND JAIN & ANR ….Respondents |
WITH |
|
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.513 OF 2002 |
|
| UNION OF INDIA V/S |
….Appellant |
| IQBAL KASAM MEM | ON & ORS. ….Respondents |
WITH |
|
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.541 OF 2002 |
|
| THE STATE OF MAHA | RASHTRA ….Appellant |
| V/S | |
ABDULAZAD ABDUL |
KADAR BHATARI & ORS. ….Respondents |
Gauri Gaekwad
amicus order.doc
2 / 5
WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1036 OF 2002 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ….Appellant V/S LAXMICHAND NAGAJI JAIN & ORS. ….Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1048 OF 2002 UNION OF INDIA ….Appellant V/S JASMIN JAYANTILAL THADESHWAR & ANR. ….Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.644 OF 2003 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ….Appellant V/S SURESH SAKHARAM SAWANT ….Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.921 OF 2003 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ….Appellant V/S ABDUL AZIZ LOKHANDWALA & ORS. ….Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.989 OF 2003 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ….Appellant V/S NABAB MOHAMMAD SHAIKH & ORS. ….Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1015 OF 2003 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ….Appellant V/S SHRI. PARSHURAM KASHINATH MULUNKAR & ANR. ….Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1033 OF 2003 TASNEEM MURSHEDKAR MAZHAR ….Appellant V/S RAMESH S/O. DHANRAJ MAHAJAN & ANR. ….Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1205 OF 2003 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ….Appellant V/S RAMCHANDRA VITTHAL CHAUGULE ….Respondent
Gauri Gaekwad
amicus order.doc
3 / 5
WITH |
|
|---|---|
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1213 OF 2003 |
|
| THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA | ….Appellant |
| V/S | |
| BHAGU KAMLU MARGALE & ORS. | ….Respondents |
WITH |
|
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1139 OF 2003 |
|
| THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA V/S |
….Appellant |
| GIRISH SHANKARLAL OSTAWAL & ORS. | ….Respondents |
WITH |
|
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1316 OF 2003AHMED SHAHABUDDIN SHAIKH & ANR. V/S |
….Appellants |
| TEJ SARAN & ANR. | ….Respondents |
WITH |
|
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1420 OF 2003 |
|
| THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA V/S |
….Appellant |
| DAYARAM EKNATH PANDHARE | ….Respondent |
WITH |
|
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1492 OF 2003 |
|
| THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA V/S |
….Appellant |
| JAYAWANT TATYABA KHAIRE | ….Respondent |
WITH |
|
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.32 OF 2004 |
|
| THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA V/S |
….Appellant |
| ASHISHKUMAR DINESHKUMAR PATIL | ….Respondent |
WITH |
|
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.95 OF 2004 |
|
| THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA V/S |
….Appellant |
| DR.UMAKANT LAXMAN BIRARIS & ORS. | ….Respondents |
WITHCRIMINAL APPEAL NO.209 OF 2004 |
|
| THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA |
….Appellant |
| V/S | |
| SAHEBRAO CHINDHA AHIRE | ….Respondent |
Gauri Gaekwad
amicus order.doc
4 / 5
WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 213 OF 2004 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ….Appellant V/S RATAN TULSHIRAM LONDHE ….Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 243 OF 2004 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ….Appellant V/S BALU RAVJI ABHANG ….Respondent ---- CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J. (IN CHAMBER) DATE : 28th FEBRUARY 2020
P.C.
1The following appeals were finally heard and decided on the
dates mentioned below:
Sr.No. |
Name of Amicus Curiae |
Appeal Number |
Finally heardand decidedon |
|---|---|---|---|
01 |
Mr. Satyavrat Joshi |
APEAL/389/1997 |
22-11-2019 |
02 |
Mr. Rohan Sawant |
APEAL/921/2003 |
20-12-2019 |
03 |
Mr. Rohan Sawant |
APEAL/1033/2003 |
02-01-2020 |
04 |
Mr. Shanay Shah |
APEAL/621/2001 |
07-01-2020 |
05 |
Mr. Rashmin Khandekar |
APEAL/1139/2003 |
07-01-2020 |
06 |
Mr. Shanay Shah |
APEAL/513/2002 |
08-01-2020 |
07 |
Ms. Spenta Hevewala |
APEAL/1048/2002 |
08-01-2020 |
08 |
Mr. Prathamesh Kamat |
APEAL/1420/2003 |
13-01-2020 |
09 |
Ms. Ayushi Anandpara |
APEAL/410/2001 |
13-01-2020 |
10 |
Ms. Trivedi Jani |
APEAL/1036/2002 |
13-01-2020 |
11 |
Mr. Shanay Shah |
APEAL/298/2002 |
15-01-2020 |
12 |
Mr. Jahangir Jejeebhoy |
APEAL/705/2000 |
20-01-2020 |
13 |
Ms. Ayushi Anandpara |
APEAL/541/2002 |
23-01-2020 |
14 |
Mr. Rohan Sawant |
APEAL/644/2003 |
27-01-2020 |
Gauri Gaekwad
amicus order.doc
5 / 5
15 |
Mr. Irfan Shaikh |
APEAL/1205/2003 |
31-01-2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
16 |
Ms. Ayushi Anandpara |
APEAL/228/2001 |
03-02-2020 |
17 |
Mr. Rohan Sawant |
APEAL/989/2003 |
04-02-2020 |
18 |
Ms. Ridhi Nyati |
APEAL/1015/2003 |
05-02-2020 |
19 |
Mr. Fauzan Shaikh |
APEAL/1213/2003 |
05-02-2020 |
20 |
Ms. Kainaz Irani |
APEAL/1316/2003 |
14-02-2020 |
21 |
Mr. Rohan Sawant |
APEAL/1492/2003 |
17-02-2020 |
22 |
Ms. Spenta Hevewala |
APEAL/32/2004 |
17-02-2020 |
23 |
Mr. Vaibhav Charalwar |
APEAL/95/2004 |
17-02-2020 |
24 |
Mr. Jamsheed Master |
APEAL/209/2004 |
18-02-2020 |
25 |
Ms. Spenta Hevewala |
APEAL/243/2004 |
20-02-2020 |
26 |
Mr. Anuj Desai |
APEAL/213/2004 |
20-02-2020 |
2 In each of the above appeals, an Amicus Curiae was appointedand their contribution has been recorded in the order of disposal.
3The High Court Legal Services Committee to award fees of the
learned Amicus Curiae fixed at Rs.10,000/- in each of the matter.
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
Gauri Gaekwad
K.R. SHRIRAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court