The appellant, on instructions, sought and was granted leave to withdraw the criminal appeal. The appeal was disposed of as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw the appeal; appeal disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
17 APEAL 1024-2014.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1024 OF 2014
M/s. Shree Swami Samarth Enterprises ] ...Appellant
Versus
Sunil Chitrasen Kalambe & Anr. ] ...Respondents
Mr. Amey V. Chandorkar i/b Ms. Aparana Rajesh More, for the Appellant.
Ms. Pranali Railkar i/b Mr. V. B. Tapkir, for Respondent No.1. Mr. P. H. Gaikwad Patil, APP for Respondent No.2-State.
CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.
DATE : 10TH FEBRUARY, 2020.
P.C:
withdraw the appeal.
[PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.]
1 of 1
Manjusha
M/s. Shree Swami Samarth Enterprises
Sunil Chitrasen Kalambe
State
Prithviraj K. Chavan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
