Disposed

Suyog Telematics Limited, Thr. Director Mr. Shivshankar Lature v. the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, Thr. Municipal Commissioner and Ors.

Bombay HC6 Mar 2020AO/354/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

On an interim application regarding building regularization, the High Court of Bombay granted ad-interim relief and directed the appellants to file a compliant proposal within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Ad-interim relief granted; Appellants directed to submit proposal within two weeks.

What the court decided

Suyog Telematics Limited, Thr. Director Mr. Shivshankar Lature vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, Thr. Municipal Commissioner and Ors. — Bombay HC (2020) — LawSathi Research

¶1

ssm 1 903-905-aost4089.20gp.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

APPEAL FROM ORDER (STAMP) NO. 4089 OF 2020

¶5

WITH

¶6

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2020 IN

¶7

APPEAL FROM ORDER (STAMP) NO. 4089 OF 2020

¶8

WITH

¶9

APPEAL FROM ORDER (STAMP) NO. 4090 OF 2020

¶10

WITH

¶11

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2020

¶12

¶13

APPEAL FROM ORDER (STAMP) NO. 4090 OF 2020

¶14

WITH

¶15

APPEAL FROM ORDER (STAMP) NO. 4093 OF 2020

¶16

WITH

¶17

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2020 IN

¶18

APPEAL FROM ORDER (STAMP) NO. 4093 OF 2020

¶19

Suyog Telematics Limited Through-Director Mr. Shivshankar Lature

¶20

…..Appellants.

¶21

Vs.

¶22

The Municipal Corporation of …..Respondents. Greater Mumbai & Ors.

¶23

1/2

¶24

ssm 2 903-905-aost4089.20gp.doc

¶25

Mr. Ansari Asggar Kalim for the Appellants. Smt. Madhuri More for the Respondents-MCGM.

¶26

CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 6^th MARCH, 2020.

¶27

P.C.:-

¶28

Learned counsel appearing for the Appellants submitted that, the Appellants had already submitted proposal for regularization of Suit structures, which the Designated Officer of Respondent-Corporation has in fact received.

¶29

2 Learned counsel for the Respondent-Corporation submitted that, the Appellants ought to have submitted the Applications “on line” instead of submitting it ‘in physical form’. As the Appellants have submitted the proposal in writing/physical form, the same were not considered by the Corporation till this date.

¶30

3 Learned counsel for the Appellants submitted that, the Appellants will submit the proposal for regularization of suit structure as prescribed by the Corporation within two weeks from today. The said statement is accepted.

¶31

Stand over to 31^st March, 2020.

¶32

Till the next date, ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (a)

¶33

of the interim Applications.

¶34

Digitally signed Sanjiv S. by Sanjiv S.Mashalkar Mashalkar Date: 2020.03.12 12:35:24 +0530

¶35

2/2

Suyog Telematics Limited, Thr. Director Mr. Shivshankar Lature v. the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, Thr. Municipal Commissioner and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Suyog Telematics Limited, Thr. Director Mr. Shivshankar Lature v. the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, Thr. Municipal Commissioner and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Parveen Abubaker Shaikh vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Safiya Baba Shaikh vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Baba K. v. Mohammed vs the Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai

Suyog Telematics Limited, Thr. Director Mr. Shivshankar Lature vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, Thr. Municipal Commissioner and Ors.

Suyog Telematics Limited, Thr. Director Mr. Shivshankar Lature vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, Thr. Municipal Commissioner and Ors.

Parveen Abubaker Shaikh vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai