In an anticipatory bail application, when the court expressed disinclination to grant relief, the applicant prays for unconditional withdrawal, which was permitted and the application disposed of accordingly.
Permission granted for unconditional withdrawal of the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
07-ABA-985-20.odt
1 / 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.985 OF 2020
Anil Jaygopal Agrawal
.... Applicant
versus
State of Maharashtra.... Respondent
Mr.Nitin Sejpal, Advocate for Applicant.Mr.Swapnil S. Pednekar, APP for the State/Respondent.CORAM: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE: 18th DECEMBER, 2020
P.C. :
1. After arguing for some time, when I expressed my
disinclination to grant relief, the learned counsel for theApplicant prays for unconditional withdrawal of this application.
2. Permission granted. Application is allowed to be
withdrawn unconditionally and is disposed of as such.
Digitally signed by PradeepkumarP. Deshmane PradeepkumarP. DeshmaneDate: 2020.12.21 16:27:26 +0530
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
Nesarikar
Anil Jaygopal Agrawal
State of Maharashtra
SARANG V. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court