The High Court of Bombay at Goa allowed the withdrawal of Criminal Writ Petition No. 104 of 2019 filed by Om Prakash Vats and others against Dinesh Kumari Sharma and others, disposing of the matter with no order as to costs.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 104 OF 2019
OM PRAKASH VATS AND ANR., ... Petitioners
Versus
DINESH KUMARI SHARMA AND 3 ORS., ... Respondents
Mr. Arun De Sa, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. D. Lawande and Mr. Amogh Prabhudessai, Advocates for the Respondent no.1. Mr. Pravin Faldessai, Additional Government Advocate for the Respondent nos.2 and 3. Mr. P. Kanekar, Advocate for the Respondent no.4.
Coram:C. V. BHADANG & NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ.
Date:11th October, 2019
P.C.
Mr. De Sa, the learned Counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.
C. V. BHADANG, J.
arp/*
OM PRAKASH VATS AND ANR.
DINESH KUMARI SHARMA AND 3 ORS.
C. V. BHADANG
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
