Writ petition rendered infructuous and withdrawn; allowed with leave to withdraw. Order discharged.
Leave to withdraw petition granted; petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
501-1-WP954-10.DOC
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 954 OF 2010
Union of India & ors.
...Petitioners
Versus
Naresh Kumar Balodia …Respondent
Mr. Raghav Shekhar, I/b The Law Point, for the Petitioners. Mr. Sandeep Marne, I/b R. R. Shetty, for the Respondent.
CORAM: RANJIT MORE & N. J. JAMADAR, JJ DATED: 29th AUGUST, 2019
PC:-
1. Mentioned for production board. Taken up on
production board in view of urgency.
2. Mr. Shekhar, the learned Counsel for the petitioners
seeks leave to withdraw the petition as the petition has
become infructuous.
Leave granted.
3. The petition stands disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]
1/1
Union of India & ors.
Naresh Kumar Balodia
Ranjit More
N. J. Jamadar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
