The High Court dismissed this writ petition as infructuous following the dismissal of PIL No.89 of 2014, as the mobilization advance was recovered with interest and the petitioner was exonerated.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(5)-WP-9131-14.doc .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.9131 OF 2014
Rajendra Ghorpade Versus
The Chief Officer, Kulgaon Badlapur Municipal Council At Badlapur, Dist. Thane and others
..Petitioner
..Respondents
Mr. Virendra Pethe, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms. Nisha Mehra, AGP for Respondent – State.
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & N. M. JAMDAR, J.
DATE : 19th JUNE, 2019
P.C.
In view of the order dismissing PIL No.89 of 2014, the
present Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous because the
mobilization advance was recovered with interest and the Petitioner
being an elected Councillor of the concerned Municipal Council has
been exonerated after show-cause notice was issued.
N. M. JAMDAR, J CHIEF JUSTICE
BGP. 1 o f 1
Rajendra Ghorpade
The Chief Officer, Kulgaon Badlapur Municipal Council
Pradeep Nandrajog
N. M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
