This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation
Petitioner
Versus
B.T.Patil Construction and Swapnali Construction & Ors.
... Respondents
Mr.Sachin Gite, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr.V.V.Tulzapurkar i/b. Mr.Mandar Soman, Advocate for the Respondent.
Mr.A.A.Palkar, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.
DATED : 4th SEPTEMBER 2019.
P.C. :
1 In these circulated writ petitions, adjournment is sought on behalf of the petitioner to which the respondents are not having any objection.
2 In this view of the matter, by consent of the parties, stand over to 25th September 2019.
1/1
Gaikwad RD
Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation
B.T.Patil Construction and Swapnali Construction & Ors.
A.M.BADAR J.
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
