This single-paragraph interregnum/dismissal order held that since the progress writ petition was preferred against an interlocutory order, it stood dismissed. No substantive reasoning or relief is provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(15)WPST-6370-19.doc
BDP-SPS
Bharat D. Pandit
Digitally signed by Bharat D. Pandit Date: 2019.08.01 11:15:25 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 6370 OF 2019
Ramesh Kadam and Others ….Petitioners.
V/s
The State of Maharashtra and Others ….. Respondents.
Mr. Pandit Kasar for the Petitioner. Mr. A.B. Kadam, AGP for Respondent No.1. Mr. T.D. Deshmukh I/b Mr. Sagar Kursija for Respondent No.3. Mr. R.D. Soni I/b Ram & Co. for Respondent No.2. ---
CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE: 26th July, 2019
P.C.:-
Since the Petition is preferred against interlocutory order, same
stands dismissed.
( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. )
1/1
Ramesh Kadam and Others
The State of Maharashtra and Others
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
