In this writ petition concerning contract-based employment of trademark examiners, the Court accepted the Respondent's undertaking to re-engage petitioners for the interim period, thereby dismissing the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
911_wpst_10309_2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO.10309 OF 2019
1.Mugdha Ravindra Pol
2.Kranti Pritam Yadav
3.Maroti Sadashiv Kamble
5.Shubhangi Namdev Vidhate
...Petitioners
Versus
Union of India and Ors.
...Respondents
Mr. Suhas Deokar with Mr. Chetan Alai with Mr. Rishab Vakharia I/b. Mr. Chetan Alai for the Petitioners.
Mr. Ashok Shetty with Ms Anamika Malhotra for the Respondents.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, JJ.
DATE : 10th JULY, 2019.
P.C.:-
The aforesaid writ petition can be conveniently disposed of
by the present order.
Megha
1/3
911_wpst_10309_2019.doc
basis on account of the fact that the regular posts required to be filled in through UPSC was consuming some time and the process was in progress. Since the Petitioners were appointed on contract basis, their services came to be terminated at the end of period of contract. However, the statement is made in the said communication that in light of interim order passed by this Court and in order to maintain the public delivery system the Respondent is ready to engage 26 examiners who were appointed on contract basis to work till 31.03.2020 or till the appointment of the regular examiner through UPSC whichever is earlier. The said communication dated 26.06.2019 addressed to the learned counsel is taken on record. The statement made in the said communication is accepted as an undertaking to this Court and in the light of the said statement we dispose of the writ petition.
Megha
2/3
911_wpst_10309_2019.doc
communication, the grievance raised in the writ petition is redressed
and no longer survive. Hence, the writ petition stands disposed of.
[SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]
Megha
3/3
Mugdha Ravindra Pol et al.
Union of India
RANJIT MORE
BHARATI H. DANGRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
