Petitioner withdrew the writ petition after depositing the demanded amount of ₹1 crore, as previously directed by this Court, which also facilitated a stay by the ITAT. The petition was disposed of as withdrawn without costs.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP 786 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 786 OF 2019
IQBAL ISMAIL VIRANI, THR. HIS CONST. ATTORNEY, RAHIM MEHBOOB VIRANI
... Petitioner
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER AND 2 ORS.
... Respondents
Mr. J. Supekar, Advocate for the petitioner. Coram:C. V. BHADANG & NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ. Date:7th October, 2019
P.C.:
Mr. J. Supekar, learned Advocate for the petitioner states that the petitioner has deposited the total amount of ₹1 crore as directed by this Court by order dated 09/09/2019 in two installments of ₹50 lakhs each which have been paid on 09/09/2019 and 28/09/2019. He further submits that the ITAT after hearing the petitioner has granted stay of the impugned order passed by the Income Tax Officer(Intl. Taxation, Panaji).
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J. C. V. BHADANG, J.
mv
IQBAL ISMAIL VIRANI
INCOME TAX OFFICER
C. V. BHADANG
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
