Disposed

Shri. Ramchandra Vitthal Shelar and Ors. v. the Collector of Pune and Ors.

Bombay HC25 Jan 2019WP/7800/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Division Bench disposed of multiple connected writ petitions filed by project affected persons claiming entitlement to benefits under the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999. Relying on a 2017 PIL, the court directed the District Resettlement Officer to examine the claims, fix an appearance date, and issue specified procedural directives within a six-month timeline.

What did the court decide?

Directed the District Resettlement Officer to examine petitioner claims under the 1999 Act; fixed appearance date for filing documents; ordered dispositive steps within six months.

Shri. Ramchandra Vitthal Shelar and Ors. Vs the Collector of… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

(901) WP-7796-13-g

¶2

DSS

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7796 OF 2013

Babu R. Burud

.. Petitioner

Vs.

The Collector of Pune and ors. .. Respondents

¶8

WITH

¶9

WRIT PETITION NO. 5217 OF 2014

¶10

Amruta R. Rate (since deceased through Legal heirs) .. Petitioner Vs. The Collector of Pune and ors. .. Respondents

¶11

WITH

¶12

WRIT PETITION NO. 7797 OF 2013

¶13

Chandrabhaga D. Shinde

¶14

.. Petitioner

¶15

Vs.

¶16

The Collector of Pune and ors.

¶17

.. Respondents

¶18

WITH

¶19

WRIT PETITION NO. 7798 OF 2013

Dnyaneshwar L. Shete

.. Petitioner

Vs.

The Collector of Pune and ors.

¶24

.. Respondents

¶25

WITH

¶26

WRIT PETITION NO. 7799 OF 2013

Ramchandra T. Hande

.. Petitioner

Vs.

The Collector of Pune and ors. .. Respondents

¶31

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7800 OF 2013

¶32

Ramchandra V. Shelar and ors. .. Petitioners

¶33

Vs.

¶34

The Collector of Pune and ors.

¶35

.. Respondents

¶36

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7801 OF 2013

¶37

Sakharam D. Ugale .. Petitioner Vs. The Collector of Pune and ors. .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7802 OF 2013

¶38

Rahibai S. Supe .. Petitioner Vs. The Collector of Pune and ors. .. Respondents

¶39

1/5

¶40

(901) WP-7796-13-g

¶41

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7803 OF 2013 Suryakant M. Gundal .. Petitioner Vs. The Collector of Pune and ors. .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7804 OF 2013 Bhoru S. Bhagit .. Petitioner Vs. The Collector of Pune and ors. .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7805 OF 2013 Ranu R. Langhi .. Petitioner Vs. The Collector of Pune and ors. .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7806 OF 2013

¶42

Bhima K. Gunjal .. Petitioner Vs. The Collector of Pune and ors. .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7807 OF 2013 Pandrinath Bhika alias Bhikaji Shirke .. Petitioner Vs. The Collector of Pune and ors. .. Respondents

¶43

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9747 OF 2013

¶44

Vanubai Kisan Ghangre (since deceased) Manjulabai B. Bhogate .. Petitioner Vs. The Collector of Pune and ors. .. Respondents

¶45

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9860 OF 2013 Shantaram K. Hande .. Petitioner Vs. The Collector of Pune and ors. .. Respondents

¶46

Mr. S.A. Sawant a/w. Mr. Abhishek Deshmukh for the Petitioners in all the petitions.

¶47

Mr. R.S. Pawar, AGP for the Respondents- State. Mr. S.S. Jadhav, Sr. Clerk, DRO Office present.

¶48

CORAM : R. M. BORDE & V. L. ACHLIYA, JJ. DATE : 25th JANUARY, 2019.

¶49

2/5

¶50

(901) WP-7796-13-g

¶51

P. C. :

¶52

1] The above Writ Petitions can be disposed of in terms of directions issued by the Division Bench of this Court in Public Interest Litigation No. 171 of 2014 decided on February 13, 2017. The Petitioners claim to be project affected persons, whose lands were acquired. It is the contention of the Petitioners that in spite of constant persuasion, no steps have been taken by the Respondents for granting the benefits under the provisions of the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999. In similar situation, while dismissing the Public Interest Litigation No. 171 of 2014 certain directions are issued. These Petitions can be disposed of conveniently by issuing similar directions. Hence, the order:

¶53

O R D E R

¶54

(i) We direct the District Resettlement Officer, Pune to examine the cases of the project affected persons herein with a view to ascertain whether they are project affected persons as claimed by them and whether they are entitled to allotment of lands under the provisions of the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999;

¶55

(ii) We further direct that the Petitioners to appear before the District Resettlement Officer, Pune on 11.02.2019 and produce necessary documents along with their Representations claiming benefits. In the event of request made by the Petitioners for grant of time to enable them to furnish the documents, it would be open for

¶56

3/5

¶57

(901) WP-7796-13-g

¶58

the District Resettlement Officer to grant further time after considering their Representations together with necessary documents;

¶59

(iii) The District Resettlement Officer, Pune shall pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible and preferably within six months from the date of appearance of the Petitioners before the concerned authority;

¶60

(iv) In the event, the District Resettlement Officer upholds entitlement of the Petitioners for allotment of land, it would be necessary for the said authorities to take further steps in pursuance of the decision and necessary steps shall be taken as early as possible and preferably within six months from the date of such decision;

¶61

(v) It is needless to mention that the Respondent-authority shall have to follow the procedure under Section 16(2) of the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999 i.e. issuance of notice to the Petitioners calling upon them to express their willingness in respect of allotment of land and on receipt of communication to the notice by the concerned authority, to take further steps expeditiously;

¶62

(vi) It would also be obligatory on the part of the Petitioners to deposit the amount within the time stipulated in the Act. In the event of any difficulty in respect of allotment of land, it would be obligatory

¶63

4/5

¶64

(901) WP-7796-13-g

¶65

on the part of the authorities to observe the procedure prescribed by law and to pass appropriate orders within the contemplation of subsection 4 of Section 16 of the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999.

¶66

2] In view of above directions, all Writ Petitions are disposed of.

¶67

3] In view of disposal of the petitions, all pending civil applications, if

¶68

any, stand disposed of.

¶69

[V. L. ACHLIYA, J.] [R. M. BORDE, J.]

¶70

5/5

Shri. Ramchandra Vitthal Shelar and Ors. v. the Collector of Pune and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri. Ramchandra Vitthal Shelar and Ors. v. the Collector of Pune and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Suresh Mulchandani Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

The Parut Co-Op. Collective Farming Soc. Ltd. Thru Chairman G v Sakpal Vs the State of Maharashtra Thru Revenue Dept. and Ors.

M. Visvesvaraya Industrial Research and Development Centre (Mvirdc) and Anr. Vs Ashwini Joshi

Amruta Ramji Rate (Decd) through Lrs Vs the Collector of Pune and Ors.

Ranu Rama Langhi Vs the Collector of Pune and Ors.

Bhoru Sitaram Bhagit Vs the Collector of Pune and Ors.