In a writ petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the dispute between the parties was settled and sought leave to withdraw the petition. The court granted the leave and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the petition granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902 WP 777.17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.777 of 2017
Mr. Rajesh Janardan Joshi …..Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and ors. …..Respondents
Ms. Megha Bajoria i/b. Mr. P. M. Patil, advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sangeeta D. Shinde, APP for the State.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, JJ. DATE : 4th APRIL, 2019.
P. C. :
Mr. Bajoria, learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset,
submits that the dispute between the parties is settled and, she seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Leave as prayed for, is granted. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
[SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]
1/1
Shubhada S Kadam
Shubhada S Kadam
The State of Maharashtra
Ranjit More
Bharati H. Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
