The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench dismissed Writ Petition No. 758 of 2019. The Court held that entertaining the petition would create an issue since the petitioner has the statutory remedy of filing an appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2901wp758.19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Writ Petition No.758 of 2019
Vijaykumar s/o Harichand Mehta, through its power of attorney holder – Girish s/o Vijaykumar Mehta
Versus Amravati Municipal Corporation, through its Municipal Commissioner, Amravati, and others.
Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order
Shri Girish I. Dipwani, Advocate for Petitioner.
Coram : R.K. Deshpande & Vinay Joshi, JJ. Dated : 29th January, 2019
To entertain this petition, would amount to creating an issue. The petitioner has got remedy of filing an appeal, if the assessment done, which according to the petitioner, is not in conformity with the provisions of the Act and the Rules.
With these observations, the petition is dismissed. All questions are left open.
Lanjewar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition should be entertained given the petitioner has the remedy of filing an appeal against the assessment.
Vijaykumar s/o Harichand Mehta
Amravati Municipal Corporation
R.K. Deshpande
Vinay Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
