The High Court of Bombay granted leave to withdraw a writ petition filed by the petitioner and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition was granted; the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903-WP-7451.2018.doc
suresh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.7451 OF 2018
eSmart Energy Solutions Pvt. Ltd. .... Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Others .... Respondents
Mr. Rahul P. Jain i/by HSA Advocates for the Petitioner. Ms R.A. Salunkhe, AGP, for the Respondent-State. Mr. Vishwanath Patil for Respondent No.2.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & G.S. PATEL, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 07, 2019
P.C:
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states
that, the instructing Advocates have received written instructions from the petitioner to seek leave to withdraw the
writ petition. Leave granted. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
(G.S. PATEL, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
eSmart Energy Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
State of Maharashtra
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
