In a writ petition under criminal appellate jurisdiction, the petitioner was granted leave to withdraw the petition due to the withdrawal of the complaint, after which the court disposed of the matter accordingly.
The petition was disposed of as withdrawn following the withdrawal of the complaint by the Respondent No. 1.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP 707-19.doc
Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 707 OF 2019
Kamal Khimjibhai Shah & anr. .Petitioners
Vs.
IVP Limited & anr. .Respondents
Mr. Manoj Harit i/b. M/s. Manoj Harit & Co., Advocate, for the Petitioners
Mr. A. R. Patil, APP, for the Respondent No. 2 – State
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 03.12.2019
P. C.
. Learned counsel for the Petitioners on instructions seeks
leave to withdraw the Petition, as the complaint itself has been withdrawn by the Respondent No. 1 / Original Complainant on 01.04.2019.
(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)
Kamal Khimjibhai Shah
IVP Limited
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
