Dismissed

Shivkumar S/O Bakaram Khobragade v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Its Secretary, Industry Energy and Labour Dept., Mumbai and Another

Bombay HC9 Oct 2019WP/677/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment dismisses a writ petition challenging the non-appointment on a expired selective/waiting list for a Lower Division Clerk post. The court held the list was valid only for twelve months under Regulation 29(a) and extended no relief. Pt dismissed.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner cannot be granted any relief as the selection/waiting list expired on 31.12.2018.

Shivkumar S/O Bakaram Khobragade Vs State of… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

1 956WP677.19.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.677/2019

¶4

Shivkumar Bakaram Khobragade
Vs.

¶5

State of Maharashtra and anr.

¶6

……........................................................................................................................................
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order
of directions and Registrar's orders

¶7

........................................................................................................................................…...
Shri. I. G. Meshram, Advocate for the petitioner.
Shri. Ambarish Joshi, Assistant Government Pleader for
respondent No.1.

¶8

Shri. G. A. Kunte, Advocate for respondent No.2.

¶9

CORAM: R.K. DESHPANDE &
VINAY JOSHI, JJ.
DATED: 09th October, 2019

¶10

.The petition seeks implementation of the
selection/waiting list dated 30.12.2017 for the post of
Lower Division Clerk (Accounts), reserve for Scheduled
Caste category in the service of respondent No. 2 -
Maharashtra State Power Generation Company Ltd.

¶11

2.As per Regulation No. 29(a), the select/
wait list remained valid for twelve months, which in the
present case is expired on 31.12.2018. The petition is
filed on 17.01.2019. We record the statement of
Shri. Kunte, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 –
Company that there was no extension for this waiting
list in terms of Rule 29(a) of the Classification and
Recruitment Regulations, 1961. We accept the said
statement.

¶12

2 956WP677.19.odt

¶13

3.In view of above, the petitioner cannot be
granted any relief.

¶14

4. Petition is dismissed.

¶15

JUDGEJUDGE

¶16

RGurnule

Shivkumar S/O Bakaram Khobragade v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Its Secretary, Industry Energy and Labour Dept., Mumbai and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shivkumar S/O Bakaram Khobragade v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Its Secretary, Industry Energy and Labour Dept., Mumbai and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh S/O Gangadhar Dhirade and Another Vs the Secretary, Dept. of Irrigation, Mumbai and Others

Prashant Dwivedy S/O Prem Shankar Dwivedy Vs Reliance Smsl Limited, through Its Director, Sanjay Jog and 3 Others

Divisional Controller,Msrtc,Chandrapur Vs Smt.Kalawati Pandurang Fulzele

Kazi Aarifullah S/O Kudaratullah and Another Vs the Principal Secretary for Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai and Others

Shri. Pradip Madhukar Petkar and Others Vs Shri. Jitendra Choudhary, Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project, Gondia and Anothe

Ku. Vidya D/O Sadashiv Lasurkar @ Sou. Vidya W/O Sudhir Bache Vs Zilla Parishad, Akola through Chief Executive Officer