The writ petition challenging an interim order of the Tribunal was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner admitted that the interim order had culminated in a final judgment delivered by the Central Administrative Tribunal on 10th July, 2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
73 wp 6763.19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 6763 of 2019
Mrs. Vandana W/o.Sanjeev Kamble …..Petitioner versus The Union of India and ors. ….Respondents
Mr. A. R. Salve, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anil C. Singh, Additional Solicitor General along with R.R.Shetty and Ms.Anamika Malhotra, advocates for respondent No.1-UOI. Mr. Rui Rodrigues along with Mr.S. S. Pathak, advocates for respondent Nos.2 and 3.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, JJ. DATE : 18th JULY, 2019.
P. C. :
Mentioned for production. Taken up on production board in view
of urgency.
[SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]
Shubhada S Kadam 1/1
Mrs. Vandana W/o.Sanjeev Kamble
The Union of India
Ranjit More
Bharati H. Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
