The Court disposed of a writ petition seeking expedited disposal of a civil suit, declining to grant a direction as there was no request for early disposal after the suit's restoration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24 wp 6259 of 2018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6259 OF 2018
Badruddin Abbas Patel
…Petitioner
versus
Pandurang Damodar Bhoir
…
Respondent
Mr. Tarun Sinha, for Petitioner.
CORAM: AKIL KURESHI &
S.J. KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE: 18th JULY, 2019
P.C.:
1.The Petitioner's sole prayer is that pending Civil Suit No.155 of 2008
pending before the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Vasai be expedited. We gather from
the Counsel for the Petitioner that once the Suit was dismissed. However, in Second
Appeal, the High Court has restored the Suit to its original position. There is nothing
on record suggesting that after restoration of the Suit, the Petitioner had requested the
concerned learned Judge for taking up the Suit for early disposal. Without fully
appreciating the workload of the Court and necessary facts, we are not inclined to
grant any directions for completing the Suit in a prescribed time frame. It is always
open for the Petitioner to request the concerned Court for such purpose. The Writ
Petition is accordingly disposed of.
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
( AKIL KURESHI, J. )
SSP 1/1
Badruddin Abbas Patel
Pandurang Damodar Bhoir
AKIL KURESHI
S.J. KATHAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court