A writ petition challenging an order under the Maharashtra Police Act was dismissed because an appeal lies before the Divisional Commissioner under section 60 of the same Act.
Petitioner dismissed with liberty to approach appellate authority and claim benefit of limitation law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICITON
WRIT PETITION NO. 599 OF 2019
Rahul Digambar Mohite. Versus State of Maharashtra & Others.
..Petitioner.
..Respondents.
Mr. V. R. Kumbhar for the Petitioner. Mr. K. V. Saste, APP for the Respondent-State.
Coram : RANJIT MORE & SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, JJ. Date : March 25, 2019 .
P. C. :
[SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.]
[RANJIT MORE, J.]
1 / 1
patilsr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition under section 134 of the Constitution is maintainable when an appeal lies under section 60 of the Maharashtra Police Act.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Rahul Digambar Mohite
State of Maharashtra
Ranjit More
Bharati H. Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
