Dismissed

Mr. Mangesh S/O Tarachand Gaidhane and Another v. State of Maharashtra, through Additional Commissioner of Police, Division No. 2, Nagpur and Others

Bombay HC10 Dec 2019WP/5987/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a reportable order where the petitioners sought to withdraw a writ petition with liberty to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal, citing an alternate remedy under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The High Court of Bombay - Nagpur Bench granted the withdrawal.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal.

Mr. Mangesh S/O Tarachand Gaidhane and Another Vs… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

1 907.WP5987.17.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.5987/2017
Mangesh Tarachand Gaidhane and another.

¶4

Vs.

¶5

State of Maharashtra and others.

¶6

…........................................................................................................................................
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order
of directions and Registrar's orders

¶7

........................................................................................................................................…...
Shri H. D. Dangre, Advocate for the petitioners.
Shri A. S. Fulzele, Additional Government Pleader for
respondent Nos.1 to 3.

¶8

Shri A. T. Purohit, Advocate for respondent Nos. 4 and 5.

¶9

Ms. Pooja Sharma, Advocate for respondent Nos.6, 11 and 12.

¶10

CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 10^th DECEMBER, 2019.

¶11

.In view of the objection raised by the
learned Counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 4
and 5 that there exists an alternate remedy of
approaching the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section
17 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial
Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002,
Shri H. D. Dangre, the learned Counsel for the
petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this petition
with liberty to approach the Tribunal.

¶12

2.Permission is granted. The petition is
disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. All
questions are left open.

¶13

JUDGEJUDGE

¶14

RGurnule

Mr. Mangesh S/O Tarachand Gaidhane and Another v. State of Maharashtra, through Additional Commissioner of Police, Division No. 2, Nagpur and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Mangesh S/O Tarachand Gaidhane and Another v. State of Maharashtra, through Additional Commissioner of Police, Division No. 2, Nagpur and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ane Industries Pvt. Ltd., Wani Area, Mungoli Open Cast Mines, Urjagram, Chandrapur Vs Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Nagpur

Ganesh S/O Patiram Bagde Vs the State of Maha., Thr. Chief Secretary (Egs), Employment Guarantee Scheme Dept., Mumbai and Other

Baban Pundlik Ingle Vs Nalanda (B.C.) Shikshan Va Krida Prasarak Sanstha, Thr. President and Another

Dr. Dhiraj S/O Ramshankarji Gupta Vs Dr. Radhika W/O Dr. Dhiraj Gupta @ Dr. Reshma Tarannum Mohd. Nasar

Rajeshwar S/O Sudhakar Dhakate Vs Shri. P.D. Sohale, Director of Economics and Statistics Planning Deptt.

Waman S/O Lobhaji Dhakate Vs Sharad L. Ahire, Chief Executifve Officer, Zilla Parishad, Bhandara