Writ petition filed by acquitted accused was disposed of as infructuous by agreement of petitioner's counsel and absence of instructions from the Public Prosecutor.
Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 (39)WP585-18.docx
rkm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.585 OF 2018
Yuvaraj Lahu Khapane ] .. Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra ] .. Respondent
Mr.Shekhar Ingawale, for the Petitioner. Mr.S.R. Shinde, APP for the State.
CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & N.R.BORKAR, JJ.
DATE : 10TH DECEMBER 2019.
P.C.:
learned counsel for the Petitioner/accused submits that challenge does not survive.
[ N.R.BORKAR, J. ] [ B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. ]
1 of 1
Yuvaraj Lahu Khapane
The State of Maharashtra
B. P. DHARMADHIKARI
N.R. BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
