The High Court disposed of the writ petition regarding a dispute over the petitioner's date of birth and consequent retirement. The court left all questions open and granted no relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order
2608wp5780.19
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 5780/2019.
Gayatri Kunjilal Invate - VERSUS-
Superintendent of Mines and others.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Shri A.V. Bhide, Advocate for the Petitioner.
CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE & VINAY JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 26, 2019.
Heard.
filing proceedings either before the Labour Court or Industrial Court, as the case may be. The dispute is regarding date of birth, on the basis of which the petitioner is made to retire from service.
Order
2608wp5780.19
2
All questions are left open. Writ Petition is, disposed
of. No costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
Rgd.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of in light of the availability of alternative remedies for the dispute regarding retirement based on date of birth.
Gayatri Kunjilal Invate
Superintendent of Mines
R.K. DESHPANDE
VINAY JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
