The petitioner, aged 54 and superannuated in 2006, filed a writ petition regarding a communication removing her as Principal from her college. Since she was out of service, the writ petition was determined to be infructuous and was dismissed without further adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sequeira
1 207-a WP 5776-2006.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 5776 OF 2006.
Ms.Bharati Bhimsen Kulkarni .. Petitioner Vs The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
.. Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Mr.A.B.Kadam - Additional Government Pleader, for RespondentState.
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & N.M.JAMDAR, J. Date : 13 June, 2019.
P.C. :
received by the College where she was working taking away the
charge of a Principal from her. Aged 54 years in the year 2006, the
Petitioner has obviously superannuated from service. The Petition is
dismissed as infructuous.
N.M.JAMDAR, J.
CHIEF JUSTICE
Bharati Bhimsen Kulkarni
The State of Maharashtra
Pradeep Nandrajog
N.M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
