Writ petition was allowed to be withdrawn by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. The petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive legal principle was established.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3.WP-569-19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.569 OF 2019
Swastik Heights CHS Ltd. … Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents
Ms.Grishma Lad for the Petitioner.
Mr.Kedar Dighe, AGP for Respondent No.1 (State).
Ms.Vandana Mahadik for Respondent No.3 (MCGM).
Mr.Rajiv Narula a/w Ms.Ekta Pandav i/b Jhangiani Narula and Associates for Respondent No.4.
CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & G.S.PATEL, JJ.
DATE :- OCTOBER 14, 2019
P.C. :-
(G.S.PATEL, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
M.M.Salgaonkar
Swastik Heights CHS Ltd.
State of Maharashtra
MCGM
Respondent No.4
S. C. DHARMADHIKARI
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
